<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Complex Processes and Analyses Therein</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gilliganondata.com/index.php/2008/04/10/complex-processes-and-analyses-therein/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gilliganondata.com/index.php/2008/04/10/complex-processes-and-analyses-therein/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, musings, and, hopefully, not too many redundancies on the world of business data. If you missed the irony in the previous sentence, you may struggle with my writing style.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:26:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oh, the Many Layers of Lead Qualification - Bullblog - Bulldog Solutions</title>
		<link>http://www.gilliganondata.com/index.php/2008/04/10/complex-processes-and-analyses-therein/comment-page-1/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>Oh, the Many Layers of Lead Qualification - Bullblog - Bulldog Solutions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 18:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilliganondata.com/?p=76#comment-386</guid>
		<description>[...] This all makes sense, right? The real benefit is that you can start looking at your conversion from step to step and, if there is a problem, have a much more focussed action plan for addressing it. When it comes to analyzing your processes and tuning them, deconstructing them makes a lot of sense. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This all makes sense, right? The real benefit is that you can start looking at your conversion from step to step and, if there is a problem, have a much more focussed action plan for addressing it. When it comes to analyzing your processes and tuning them, deconstructing them makes a lot of sense. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.Hamel</title>
		<link>http://www.gilliganondata.com/index.php/2008/04/10/complex-processes-and-analyses-therein/comment-page-1/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>S.Hamel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 02:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilliganondata.com/?p=76#comment-378</guid>
		<description>Hey Tim! Thanks for your kind words! :)
Really liked this post, you got my point perfectly. Near the end you talk about loosing sign of the forest because we look at the trees: that&#039;s a risk that can be alleviated by always keeping in mind the strategic objectives. So even if we sometimes become very tactical in our analysis, they should always have to serve the ultimate goal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tim! Thanks for your kind words! <img src='http://www.gilliganondata.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Really liked this post, you got my point perfectly. Near the end you talk about loosing sign of the forest because we look at the trees: that&#8217;s a risk that can be alleviated by always keeping in mind the strategic objectives. So even if we sometimes become very tactical in our analysis, they should always have to serve the ultimate goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

