<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PowerPoint / Presentations / Data Visualization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gilliganondata.com/index.php/2009/04/16/powerpoint-presentations-data-visualization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gilliganondata.com/index.php/2009/04/16/powerpoint-presentations-data-visualization/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, musings, and, hopefully, not too many redundancies on the world of business data. If you missed the irony in the previous sentence, you may struggle with my writing style.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:26:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.gilliganondata.com/index.php/2009/04/16/powerpoint-presentations-data-visualization/comment-page-1/#comment-19345</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilliganondata.com/?p=283#comment-19345</guid>
		<description>@Andrew My apologies -- I think it was clear that I was making a pretty quick judgment based on my impression of one person&#039;s video review. I went back and watched Duarte&#039;s review again, and I think the phrases &quot;like a doctoral thesis&quot; and &quot;real commitment to get through it&quot; were what stuck in my mind. But, you&#039;re right, in that she did use the phrases you pointed out (&quot;cool&quot; multiple times), and she closed with a &quot;highly recommend.&quot; Clearly, I need to order a copy and get firsthand knowledge! It&#039;s on my list!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andrew My apologies &#8212; I think it was clear that I was making a pretty quick judgment based on my impression of one person&#8217;s video review. I went back and watched Duarte&#8217;s review again, and I think the phrases &#8220;like a doctoral thesis&#8221; and &#8220;real commitment to get through it&#8221; were what stuck in my mind. But, you&#8217;re right, in that she did use the phrases you pointed out (&#8220;cool&#8221; multiple times), and she closed with a &#8220;highly recommend.&#8221; Clearly, I need to order a copy and get firsthand knowledge! It&#8217;s on my list!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Abela</title>
		<link>http://www.gilliganondata.com/index.php/2009/04/16/powerpoint-presentations-data-visualization/comment-page-1/#comment-19009</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Abela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilliganondata.com/?p=283#comment-19009</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sounds like a bit dry&quot;!!  I heard Nancy use words like &quot;cool,&quot; &quot;engaging,&quot; and &quot;a good read&quot; - where did you get &quot;dry&quot;?  Admittedly, she said that my book was somewhat more analytically-focused, but why did you assume &quot;dry&quot; - or &quot;niche&quot; - from that?  You are after all &quot;Gilligan on Data,&quot; not &quot;Gilligan on Fluff,&quot; so I assume that you would approve of an analytical approach to presentation design :-)

To your questions at the end of the post - yes, I think you can take the same rigor you have taken to data visualization and apply it to presentations, and no, you cannot push the envelope gently -- you need to make that radical break!

You can do it, I know you can, Tim.  And if I can be of any help, let me know.

Best regards,

Andrew Abela
Author of Advanced Presentations by Design, and presentation trainer to Microsoft (makers of PowerPoint) and other fine corporations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sounds like a bit dry&#8221;!!  I heard Nancy use words like &#8220;cool,&#8221; &#8220;engaging,&#8221; and &#8220;a good read&#8221; &#8211; where did you get &#8220;dry&#8221;?  Admittedly, she said that my book was somewhat more analytically-focused, but why did you assume &#8220;dry&#8221; &#8211; or &#8220;niche&#8221; &#8211; from that?  You are after all &#8220;Gilligan on Data,&#8221; not &#8220;Gilligan on Fluff,&#8221; so I assume that you would approve of an analytical approach to presentation design <img src='http://www.gilliganondata.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>To your questions at the end of the post &#8211; yes, I think you can take the same rigor you have taken to data visualization and apply it to presentations, and no, you cannot push the envelope gently &#8212; you need to make that radical break!</p>
<p>You can do it, I know you can, Tim.  And if I can be of any help, let me know.</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Andrew Abela<br />
Author of Advanced Presentations by Design, and presentation trainer to Microsoft (makers of PowerPoint) and other fine corporations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

