<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All Web Analytics Tools Are the Same (at least when it comes to data capture)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gilliganondata.com/index.php/2010/02/27/all-web-analytics-tools-are-the-same-at-least-when-it-comes-to-data-capture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gilliganondata.com/index.php/2010/02/27/all-web-analytics-tools-are-the-same-at-least-when-it-comes-to-data-capture/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, musings, and, hopefully, not too many redundancies on the world of business data. If you missed the irony in the previous sentence, you may struggle with my writing style.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:26:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: business directory</title>
		<link>http://www.gilliganondata.com/index.php/2010/02/27/all-web-analytics-tools-are-the-same-at-least-when-it-comes-to-data-capture/comment-page-1/#comment-103695</link>
		<dc:creator>business directory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilliganondata.com/?p=696#comment-103695</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;business directory...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]All Web Analytics Tools Are the Same (at least when it comes to data capture) &#124; Gilligan on Data by Tim Wilson[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>business directory&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]All Web Analytics Tools Are the Same (at least when it comes to data capture) | Gilligan on Data by Tim Wilson[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chelsea Jersey 2011 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.gilliganondata.com/index.php/2010/02/27/all-web-analytics-tools-are-the-same-at-least-when-it-comes-to-data-capture/comment-page-1/#comment-102612</link>
		<dc:creator>Chelsea Jersey 2011 2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilliganondata.com/?p=696#comment-102612</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;where to buy Premier and Stitched Miami Dolphins jerseys ??...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]we adivce go to this website to see more about Miami Dolphins jerseys and others. [...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>where to buy Premier and Stitched Miami Dolphins jerseys ??&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]we adivce go to this website to see more about Miami Dolphins jerseys and others. [...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Site index</title>
		<link>http://www.gilliganondata.com/index.php/2010/02/27/all-web-analytics-tools-are-the-same-at-least-when-it-comes-to-data-capture/comment-page-1/#comment-100260</link>
		<dc:creator>Site index</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilliganondata.com/?p=696#comment-100260</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Site index...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]All Web Analytics Tools Are the Same (at least when it comes to data capture) &#124; Gilligan on Data by Tim Wilson[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Site index&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]All Web Analytics Tools Are the Same (at least when it comes to data capture) | Gilligan on Data by Tim Wilson[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Analytics (How It Works) Explained in 4 Minutes &#124; Gilligan on Data by Tim Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.gilliganondata.com/index.php/2010/02/27/all-web-analytics-tools-are-the-same-at-least-when-it-comes-to-data-capture/comment-page-1/#comment-97157</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Analytics (How It Works) Explained in 4 Minutes &#124; Gilligan on Data by Tim Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 16:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilliganondata.com/?p=696#comment-97157</guid>
		<description>[...] The video is a much simplified overview of what I went into in greater detail in an earlier blog post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The video is a much simplified overview of what I went into in greater detail in an earlier blog post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Analytics tools Comparison -- Sitecatalyst, Google Analytics, Webtrends, Coremetrics &#124; Gilligan on Data by Tim Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.gilliganondata.com/index.php/2010/02/27/all-web-analytics-tools-are-the-same-at-least-when-it-comes-to-data-capture/comment-page-1/#comment-95514</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Analytics tools Comparison -- Sitecatalyst, Google Analytics, Webtrends, Coremetrics &#124; Gilligan on Data by Tim Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 03:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilliganondata.com/?p=696#comment-95514</guid>
		<description>[...] Basic page tag data capture mechanics &#8212; 95th percentile &#8212; this is actually something pretty important to have a good handle on when it comes to understanding one of the key differences between Sitecatalyst and other tools [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Basic page tag data capture mechanics &#8212; 95th percentile &#8212; this is actually something pretty important to have a good handle on when it comes to understanding one of the key differences between Sitecatalyst and other tools [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilligan&#8217;s eMetrics Recap &#8212; Washington, D.C. 2010 &#124; Gilligan on Data by Tim Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.gilliganondata.com/index.php/2010/02/27/all-web-analytics-tools-are-the-same-at-least-when-it-comes-to-data-capture/comment-page-1/#comment-57306</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilligan&#8217;s eMetrics Recap &#8212; Washington, D.C. 2010 &#124; Gilligan on Data by Tim Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 02:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilliganondata.com/?p=696#comment-57306</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jannis</title>
		<link>http://www.gilliganondata.com/index.php/2010/02/27/all-web-analytics-tools-are-the-same-at-least-when-it-comes-to-data-capture/comment-page-1/#comment-40765</link>
		<dc:creator>Jannis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 12:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilliganondata.com/?p=696#comment-40765</guid>
		<description>Hey Tim, great article.
We´re currently working on an analytics tool that works a bit different and is suited for custom usecases: the user just sends the data thats intersting to him and he doesn´t need to use JavaScript in this case.

If you want to have a look, just check my website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tim, great article.<br />
We´re currently working on an analytics tool that works a bit different and is suited for custom usecases: the user just sends the data thats intersting to him and he doesn´t need to use JavaScript in this case.</p>
<p>If you want to have a look, just check my website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: link list for march 2010 &#171; Mixotricha</title>
		<link>http://www.gilliganondata.com/index.php/2010/02/27/all-web-analytics-tools-are-the-same-at-least-when-it-comes-to-data-capture/comment-page-1/#comment-38984</link>
		<dc:creator>link list for march 2010 &#171; Mixotricha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilliganondata.com/?p=696#comment-38984</guid>
		<description>[...] list for march&#160;2010    Use your skin as a keyboard all web analytics tools are the same when it comes to data capture Biology wrap video : great way of teaching ! We’re all alone and no one knows why Un-google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] list for march&nbsp;2010    Use your skin as a keyboard all web analytics tools are the same when it comes to data capture Biology wrap video : great way of teaching ! We’re all alone and no one knows why Un-google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernest Mueller</title>
		<link>http://www.gilliganondata.com/index.php/2010/02/27/all-web-analytics-tools-are-the-same-at-least-when-it-comes-to-data-capture/comment-page-1/#comment-38085</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernest Mueller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilliganondata.com/?p=696#comment-38085</guid>
		<description>Great summary, you make a crusty old Web Admin proud :-)

The other important thing to note about this method is that it&#039;s a little lossy.  We spent months trying to figure out why when we first implemented page tagging, moving from our older log-based model, that we seemed to be missing visits.  I spent a lot of time comparing our access logs to the raw page tag log from the supplier and in the end, for mysterious reasons (and believe me I know and accounted for all the reasons page tag results are *supposed* to be different from log results), page tagging was dropping about 5% of our visits.  (Page tags got some visits logging didn&#039;t, but lost a bunch logging did, and this is the net difference.)  In the end, the supplier admitted &quot;Yeah... That happens.&quot;  

For marketing purposes, that&#039;s usually just fine.  But I think it&#039;s important to note that what you see from page tagging isn&#039;t 100% of what&#039;s actually happening, so don&#039;t make logic mistakes based on it (e.g. &quot;I&#039;m sure no one from Company X has looked at our Web site, because it doesn&#039;t show up in our page tag based analytics.&quot;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great summary, you make a crusty old Web Admin proud <img src='http://www.gilliganondata.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The other important thing to note about this method is that it&#8217;s a little lossy.  We spent months trying to figure out why when we first implemented page tagging, moving from our older log-based model, that we seemed to be missing visits.  I spent a lot of time comparing our access logs to the raw page tag log from the supplier and in the end, for mysterious reasons (and believe me I know and accounted for all the reasons page tag results are *supposed* to be different from log results), page tagging was dropping about 5% of our visits.  (Page tags got some visits logging didn&#8217;t, but lost a bunch logging did, and this is the net difference.)  In the end, the supplier admitted &#8220;Yeah&#8230; That happens.&#8221;  </p>
<p>For marketing purposes, that&#8217;s usually just fine.  But I think it&#8217;s important to note that what you see from page tagging isn&#8217;t 100% of what&#8217;s actually happening, so don&#8217;t make logic mistakes based on it (e.g. &#8220;I&#8217;m sure no one from Company X has looked at our Web site, because it doesn&#8217;t show up in our page tag based analytics.&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BACS</title>
		<link>http://www.gilliganondata.com/index.php/2010/02/27/all-web-analytics-tools-are-the-same-at-least-when-it-comes-to-data-capture/comment-page-1/#comment-37947</link>
		<dc:creator>BACS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilliganondata.com/?p=696#comment-37947</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing this group of lesson learned, you have added a few points that I need to go away and consider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing this group of lesson learned, you have added a few points that I need to go away and consider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

