Data Visualization that Is Colorblind-Friendly — Excel 2007?

By on in , with 12 Comments

Wow. This post started out not as a post, but as what I thought was going to be a 5-minute exercise with Google to download a colorblind-friendly palette for Excel charts. That was two weeks ago, and this post is just scratching the surface.

Several weeks ago, one of the presenters in a meeting showed some data as a map overlay. As soon as she projected the first map, someone in the meeting quipped, “Good luck understanding this one, Jim!” Jim, you see, is colorblind. And, apparently, most of the people in the meeting knew it. Approximately 8% of men have some form of color blindness (it’s much more rare in women — only 1 in 200). And the overlays on the map were color-coded very subtly. Jim commented that it was hopeless!

As it happened, I was exploring a fresh set of data that same week, as we’d recently rolled out some new customer data capture capabilities. As I worked through how best to present the results, I decided to grab a colorblind-friendly palette from the web and use it in the visualization of the information. I’d hoped to find a site with one or more Excel files that I could download with such a palette, but, worst case, I was prepared to snag a palette and manually update my Excel file (for future sharing on this blog, of course!).

No. Such. Luck!

What I did find was a slew of information on the different types of color blindness (which I’ll touch on briefly in a bit), as well as a bevy of almost-useful tools and palettes:

  • How to make figures and presentations that are friendly to Colorblind people — ultimately, I used the palette that is ~2/3 of the way down this page for my spreadsheet (the figure labeled “Set of colors that is unambiguous both to colorblinds and non-colorblinds”).  Mr. Excel actually references this palette and provides a macro that will update a workbook’s palette with this palette. The downside of this palette is that, while it may be plenty functional, I can’t say I’m wild about it from an aesthetic viewpoint. But, I’d spent the 30 minutes I’d given myself to dig, so I ran with it.
  • Colorjack Color Blindness Simulation — a view of the color spectrum as seen by people with eight different forms of color blindness. That’s informative…but doesn’t really provide a realistic way to build a functional palette for data visualization purposes.
  • Colorjack — a nifty tool for finding a color palette. Unfortunately…there’s no way to test how colorblind-friendly any of the palettes are
  • Colorblind Web Page Filter — there were a number of tools for sale that would simulate how content would appear to people with different forms of colorblindness, but this is the (free) online tool I wound up using for the exercise below. It couldn’t be easier to use — you just provide a URL and what form of color blindness you’re interested in, and it renders it

So, aside from the one palette that was solely focussed on functionality and not at all on aesthetics, I struck out. As I pondered this over the next few days, it occurred to me that, perhaps Excel’s default colors always seemed so gosh-awful because they were actually developed explicitly with colorblindness in mind. I could not find any documentation to support the theory…so I turned left and headed down that rathole to see if I could figure it out myself.

The exercise was pretty simple. I created a 10-color bar chart using the Excel 2007 default palette. Note: This was created purely for palette-testing — this actual chart is a great example of needlessly using more color than is needed! Here’s the chart:

Excel 2007 Default Chart Colors
Excel 2007 Default Chart Colors

Like the one colorblind-friendly palette I found online, I really don’t like the aesthetics of this palette. It’s been toned down a bit from the Excel 2003 (and earlier) versions, which is good, but it still seems rather harsh. Could that be for colorblind compatibility? I think so! I took the chart above and ran it through the Colorblind Web Page Filter mentioned above for the four most common types of color blindness (as described in a Pearson report by Betsy J. Case):

Excel 2007 Default Chart Colors -- Deuteranomaly (Affects 4.9% of Males)
Deuteranomaly (Affects 4.9% of Men)
Excel 2007 Default Chart Colors -- Deuteranopia (Affects 1.1% of Men)
Deuteranopia (Affects 1.1% of Men)
Excel 2007 Default Chart Colors -- Protanopia (Affects 1% of Men)
Protanopia (Affects 1% of Men)
Excel 2007 Default Chart Colors -- Protanomaly (Affects 1% of Men)
Protanomaly (Affects 1% of Men)

Overall, the palette seems workable in all four situations. The first three colors absolutely work. Color 4, as well as color 5, start to lose a little contrast from color 1, but they still seem manageable. Color 5 and color 7, as well as color 10, start to get a little problematic in some cases, but, if you’re going beyond four colors in a single chart, you might need to reconsider your chart type anyway. Right?

Now, one final test: for achromatopsia. On the one hand, this is extremely rare. On the other hand…it’s common when your office has a lot of black-and-white printers:

Excel 2007 Default Chart Colors -- Achromatopsia
Achromatopsia (Extremely Rare)

Apparently, any palette that works in grayscale is a quick way to check for compatibility with all forms of colorblindness. It’s also…a best practice. Interestingly, the Excel 2007 palette really lays an egg here, in that colors 1, 2, and 4 are all barely distinguishable!

Clearly, there is an opportunity here to test a variety of functional, attractive palettes for grayscale printability and the top four forms of colorblindness and develop something better than the Excel defaults. But, that’s an exercise for another time. I think I’ll aim for the first four colors of the palette being “highly distinguishable” in all scenarios and the next four being “functionally distinguishable.” What do you think? Would this be useful? What else should I take into consideration?


  1. I am very interested in this study and have equally been trying to define a set of ‘useful’ colors. I came across a set of 8 ‘unambiguous’ colors but you have at least extended this to a possible 10. Is there anyway you can provide me with the RGB or SVG codes for these colors ?

  2. Absolutely. These are just the Excel 2007 defaults, numbered as they are numbered in the post.

    R,G,B (0-255) | #RGB (Hex)

    1 – 69,114,167 | #4572A7
    2 – 170,70,67 | #AA4643
    3 – 137,165,78 | # 89A54E
    4 – 113,88,143 | #71588F
    5 – 65,152,175 | #4198AF
    6 – 219,132,61 | #DB843D
    7 – 147,169,207 | #93A9CF
    8 – 209,147,146 | #D19392
    9 – 185,205,150 | #B9CD96
    10 – 169,155,189 | #A99BBD

  3. Pingback How Succinctly Can I Explain Why Pie Charts Are Evil? | Gilligan on Data by Tim Wilson

  4. Thanks for your post! You should check out Color Oracle, a color blindness simulator that works on all major operating systems.
    As for color blind friendly pallets, check out Colorbrewer, although intended for cartographers, any data designer will find the color palette advice useful. (Look for the “colorblind safe” check-box under the color schemes.)

  5. Pingback bath remodeling|kitchen remodeling|kitchen remodel|bath remodel|kitchen bath remodel

  6. I suspect these palettes are poorly chosen for functionality. It seems people with ‘normal’ vision don’t like vivid colors. I have trouble seeing red and green myself, but I can tell you it is a lot harder to differentiate pastel green-gray from pastel green-aqua. WHY IS EVERYONE APPARENTLY SO OPPOSED TO VIVID COLORS?

    Oh – Yes, I am shouting. I am sick of this nonsense. Not one color in that palette is vivid. Oh, perhaps normal people think more vivid colors just are not as fashionable? I need to DIFFERENTIATE the colors. I don’t give one rats butt for your style or aesthetic concerns if you don’t think my comprehension of the data trumps style. People like me are not ornaments in a room – we have a right to see the data clearly. And – apparently you don’t care. Here, even when you try to be “helpful”, you have chose obviously-dull, non-differentiable colors. I am so frustrated I could punch a wall.

    I can even pass the military’s minimum test for a pilot’s color vision (Farnsworth lantern), but I still have trouble with these palette’s, especially when the lines are less than 0.75 wide. What is it like for people with worse vision? Ah, why do you care? Apparently, it’s not ‘hip’ or ‘with it’ to have more bold but less ‘pleasing’ colors, even if it is at the expense of a handicapped minority. 🙁

    This is VERY disappointing! If this is ‘helpful’, then I don’t need help. I am just as blind with this palette.

  7. Thanks for chiming in, Bruce. The more I’ve focussed on data visualization, the more I’ve found that, with appropriate chart type selection, “color” should only be needed for specific callouts/accents. It’s one of the reasons that pie charts are inherently evil (it’s by no means the only one) — they *have* to rely on color differentiation. Horizontal bar charts for a single data set can be any color, flashy or neutral tone, because they don’t require color as an element for comprehension.

  8. Pingback » Facebook Status Updates: Exploring Optimal Timing | Tim Wilson's Blog at Web Analytics Demystified

  9. The 2019-20 TV season is shaping up to be the strongest as well as most various year yet. There are lots of exciting, original pilots coming up and just as lots of reboots/revivals in the works, too. Yet like the stating goes, “Out with the old, in with the new.” While some collection are finishing on a pre-planned, well-balanced high note, different programs’ life expectancies have been cut in advance brief. So, sadly, here is a list of all the TV programs which you may be revealing goodbye to this year.

    Find me on

Leave your Comment

« »